Thanks for visiting our site!
God Longevity
Checkout Ebay Auctions For The Cheapest Prices
 |
 Buddhism 100% Bronze cloisonne 24K Gold Fu Lu Shou Three Longevity God Buddha  US $8,399.00
|
 Chinese Hetian Jade Longevity God Amulet Pendant Carvin US $38.00
|
| Powered by phpBay Pro |
Here are some more information for God Longevity:
Is There a God Spot in Your 3-Pound Coconut?
You decide. Scientists who believe in double-blind experiments or
fMRIs, have offered evidence of multiple synapses firing in their
specific circuits when Nuns think of God; but not for you or me.
You believe what you choose about the existence of God or the
presence of oxygen on the Moon or Mars. We are dealing with
research by scientists who scanned the brains of 15 Carmelite Nuns.
When Homo sapiens experience a profound religious experience
including feelings of peace, happiness and self-awareness, specific
brain structures light up on fMRIs. Any other thoughts do not
cause blood with oxygen to flow into these brains areas to be seen
on a computer read-out. Only Nuns show these reactions.
Areas
University of Montreal scientists Mario Beauregard and
Vincent Paquette had their work published in the journal,
Neuroscience Letters, 8.30.06.
Blood oxygen levels and electrical activity (cycles per second) statistically surged
when these Nuns meditated on connecting with their feelings of the
presence of God. There is no reaction (no electrical surge for you or me).
The areas involved are the Orbito-frontal Cortex (emotions) and the right middle
Temporal Cortex (contacting spiritual entities). When they concentrated on
emotional activities with other humans, these area were inhibited. Nada.
Is there one God Spot? No! There are two major spots and ten minor regions
involved.
So What
You do not have to believe in God and/or religion to acknowledge the merits
of this new knowledge. On a planet with six and one-half billion folks, is it hard
to believe those who are involved 24/7 with God and religion, can access parts
of the brain that secular folks never occupy?
At Stanford University they studied Tibetan monks under fMRIs and discovered they activated Gamma cycles per second (Hz) when meditating. The rest of us have Alpha, Beta, Theta and Delta. Gamma does not exist for us in our lifetime.
What Can We Learn From That
1. Get this: complex movements of the hands can result in outputs from your
Motor Cortex, that strengthen (excite) some of your synapses, and weaken (inhibit)
others. This means retraining your eye-movements for speed reading changes the
function and structure of your brain.
2. Your Motor Cortex map changes based on the movements you teach yourself.
Learning to ride a bike, drive a car, and type for example, change your Motor Cortex memory, not your muscle-memory.
3. Go Lizard! (widen your eye-span to include peripheral vision) while reading not
only permits you to triple (3x) your learning speed, it improves your brain functions.
There is new research in September 2007 to confirm reducing up to
40% your risk of Alzheimer, and increase your potential for an additional nine years of longevity.
All you have to do is become a life-long-learner. Learning new cognitive skills to create a Firewall of protection for your brain, including Cognitive Reserve to avoid old age mania, is within your control and will power. You can start at any age.
Save This
Google: Donold O. Hebb (1949) The Cells that fire together, wire together.
The Effects of Motor Skill Learning: M. Merzenich, 1996 Journal of Neuroscience
16: pp.785-807
You might want to retain the knowledge that - experience changes the connectivity
of neurons in response to yur circuits most activated (repetition). Use it or lose it and if you want longevity and no Alz - be a life-long-learner using new cognitive
skills.
In speed reading vs snailing (your 3rd grade reading skills learned from
Mrs. Harrison) you activate different brain structures including Vetibulo-Ocular
Reflex a/k/a Fresh-Pursuit-Tracking using your head and eyes.
Your eye-movements are controlled by your Cerebellum (hbw@speedlearning.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Author of Speed Learning for Professionals, published by Barron's; partner of Evelyn Wood, creator of speed reading, graduating two million, including the White House staffs of four U.S. Presidents.
Interviewed by the Wall Street Journal and fortune Magazine for major articles.
http://www.speedlearning.org hbw@speedlearning.org
Comment On ‘Against The Gods: The Remarkable Story Of Risk’ By Peter L Bernstein
Bernstein discusses the evolving view over time of the difference between ‘uncertainty’ and ‘risk’. Risk is associated with the probability of a particular result. Uncertainty is associated with the possibility of an outcome. He discusses these concepts in relation to financial markets and investment. But most of the ideas put forward are generally considered to be relevant to the operation of civilization. He has the typical anthropocentric view of what happens.
He mentions how various people have had differing views about the relative impact of uncertainty and risk over the centuries. But their arguments are all based on the premise that the future is uncertain to a large degree. The focus in this discussion is on developments over centuries is the enumeration of probability. This is probably appropriate in relation to financial markets where future decisions of individuals can have a big impact. For example, fiat money can be created, as now, and this will have an uncertain impact on the economy. Human decisions can have a significant impact on what happens to economies in the future.
There is also a degree of uncertainty about how natural systems will operate. Natural disasters, like the Victorian bush fires, Hurricane Katrina, Sichuan earthquake and the Sumatran tsunami, can occur. There is appreciable uncertainty about the timing and severity of these disasters. But there is very little uncertainty about many natural events. I am willing to bet the sun will rise in the east tomorrow. There will be more earthquakes. Seismologists have some idea of where they will occur but less knowledge about when. The residents of Tokyo and San Francisco live with that uncertainty. There will be more volcanic eruptions sometime in the future and we have essentially no capability to stop them. I am willing to bet, although I will not be here, that I will not see out this century as I am already old. I may be able to prolong my life by employing sensible measures but that will not change the certainty of the outcome! Bernstein harps on uncertainty yet I expect he accepts his own mortality. I will not comment on the applicability of what he has to say about risk management in the financial market. He gives appreciable insight into what has happened in the decade since he wrote the book.
But his views give rise to grave misunderstanding of what the operations of civilization are doing to its life support system, what is available from the environment. For example, they support the common, erroneous view that oil will continue to be available. There is appreciable uncertainty about how much energy we can harness from alternative sources. But it is certain that we will not be able to use 86 million barrels of oil per day at the end of this century. These views also support the erroneous contention that we can install systems that can harness vast natural forces to reverse global warming. The fact that we have unknowingly initiated climate change by enabling the unleashing of the vast forces in the fossil fuels does not mean we can reverse that process. There is little doubt that many systems will be installed to lessen the degree of climate change but it cannot be stopped and it certainly cannot be reversed..
Bernstein comments on the value of making rational decisions but does not mention the fact that using up the irreplaceable stock of oil, often in very wasteful manner, is a major example of how irrational society is.
Perhaps the most irrational aspect of the way Bernstein considers the operation of the economy is in the pursuit of what society regards as wealth. There was a time when society built up real wealth by using innovation coupled with the ‘cheap’ energy we garnered from the environment. But it went to our heads! We now have the spurious wealth created by the money games Bernstein discusses. And they are now imploding. There is little doubt that the views expressed by Bernstein and his ilk has had an impact on the investments scene in recent years. The most telling point is that the complexity of that awesome invention, derivatives is beyond the comprehension of even the cleverest of humans. So, they have made the mistake of getting computers to make the mistakes for them!
He has some critical comments on chaos theory without acknowledging that it does have a place in understanding of what actually happens. It would be interesting to have his view on the fact that we know oak trees have predictable forms of leaves even though they do vary in size. The shape, size and longevity of people is also fairly predictable!
He ends with
The central theme of this whole story is that the quantitative achievements of the heroes we have met have shaped the trajectory of progress over the past 450 years. In engineering, medicine, science, finance, business, and even in government, decisions that touch everyone’s life are now made in accordance with disciplined procedures that far outperform the seat-of-the-pants methods of the past. Many catastrophic errors of judgment are thus either avoided, or else their consequences are muted.
It is ironical that he ends with this comment about ‘errors of judgment’. Society has made a profound error of judgment in exuberantly using up limited natural capital. Its operations are now totally dependent on irreversibly depleting that capital. Our civilization is now addicted to using this scarce natural resource at a high rate. The edifice of our civilization, the financial market is in chaotic disarray for reasons that Bernstein articulated well. The foundations, however, are crumbling but un-noticed by those transfixed on the money games. ‘Against the Gods’ is an appropriate title for what has happened!
About the Author
Could God be dead?
Many people believe that there was a master creator aka God. If God was an actual being then given the longevity of the universe and the natural order that all living things die, then would it be possible that the creator (God) is now deceased/extint? Could that be why we can't get in touch with him or find evidence that he is existant?
To 'Tone B'.
Of course you would be here. You could be a long line decendant, unless of course you believe that God himself hand made you?
no, God of Heaven is not dead
We have rejected our Heavenly Father so much, and have fallen so far away, it may seem he does not care, but he does care, we just refuse to let him 
Yankee Stadium Announcer Olden Keeps Fit Chasing `Voice of God' Longevity
New York Yankees public-address announcer Paul Olden is counting his calories and taking care of his voice, hoping for the same longevity as the man he replaced.
Thanks for visiting!
